>>1974 LMAO

>>1974 This and pic related are my two favourites.

the redscare girl who kicked the hornets nest

>>1995 What is the context behind this. I know Anna constantly posts....interesting.....takes on twitter that get her in trouble but I haven't seen her take on troons.

>>1995 kek, i can't deal with these two. what happened? she said trans is as stupid as trans race? idk why anna hasn't capitalized on the troon issue hard before. her entire shtick is triggering leftists so why not

>>1998 >>1997 yeah she said the logic behind transracialism and transgenderism is no different. she was dropping hints hard in the sub that she thinks that there are additional "psychological factors" at play. i think the ana valen's teledonic dildo gaming journalism plus transpatriarchy breeding factory fetish tweets disgusted a lot of people, even pickmes. i am tentatively hopeful about the reaction to someone a little younger and "cooler" than jk rowling publicly questioning trans logic

>>1999 god i hope so. the great thing about anna being the one to do this instead of one of the other less hardened edgy lefthots is that she already has that verrrry well developed habit of covering up her shitty takes with 12 million layers of pseudo-intellectual cope rather than issuing an apology, so she's very unlikely to back down as most people do. it's likely that the sub will just get their usual manifesto from her, except that this time it'll FINALLY have some merit to it. almost exciting.

>>2081 Anon the world desperately needs more women to become scientists, doctors, politicians, philosophers or hell even a woman who changes tires for a living does something for the betterment of women but CEOs of multi-national companies are just evil, boss bitches whatever do not contribute anything for womankind or the world as a whole

>>2081 I feel like this was made by a guy working towards an MBA that really hates the "SJWs" and is trying to claim these are the most frequently said things made by them, when really these are the words of men, most often

>>2081 Super gross. Female liberation has nothing to do with more women being bourgeois. Fuck this meme. Fuck female CEOs, I don't care that they're women, they serve the same class that enables the enslavement of poor women like me, like MOST women.

>>2539 I get the intention behind the last meme, but it really does make the TIM come across as the victim, and even with the size difference the TIM comes across as way too female like

>>2540 Please. Victimism doesn't get anyone far anyway

>>2541 either way, the TIM looks way to much like a woman, maybe a edit to the Jaw and squaring the face might make him look like a TIM

>>2542 A lot of TIMs look exactly like a woman. Not all of them are Caitlyn Jenners, actually more and more are starting to take hormones as pre teens therefore coming to look almost exactly like women

>>2543 >coming to look almost exactly like women Hmm...Nah. Sounds like troon delusion.

>>2544 Kim Petras is passible non. And I don't think anyone would guess pic related is tranny if he hadn't said it. They both enter womens bathrooms and etc and I doubt anyone notices they are scrotes. If trannies start hormone therapy early a lot of them come to look pretty indistinguishable from women

>>2539 only 80%? what violent crimes are women committing I wonder? honestly if anything I'm happy that it's less skewed than I thought it was, because equality lol

>>2547 2011 arrest data from the FBI: Males constituted 98.9% of those arrested for forcible rape Males constituted 87.9% of those arrested for robbery Males constituted 85.0% of those arrested for burglary Males constituted 83.0% of those arrested for arson. Males constituted 81.7% of those arrested for vandalism. Males constituted 81.5% of those arrested for motor-vehicle theft. Males constituted 79.7% of those arrested for offenses against family and children. Males constituted 77.8% of those arrested for aggravated assault Males constituted 58.7% of those arrested for fraud. Males constituted 57.3% of those arrested for larceny-theft. Males constituted 51.3% of those arrested for embezzlement.

>>2545 >Kim Petras >passable He's extremely obvious next to actual women, he's always startlingly bigger than them (if not in height, the head size) and looks like a drag queen. Also, do you have any unposed, unshooped/face-tuned, candid photos of that one?

>>2544 >>2545 >>2549 I don't consider Kim Petras or Jazz Jennings to be typical TIMs, they were put on hormones when they were toddlers by their narcissist, sexist parents who believed boys can be feminine I don't view them as the fetishist TIMs, I view them as victims of the gender cult, their bodies are just fucked up forever and I feel awful for them

>>2550 Lol. They are all fetishist scrotes anon

>>2549 He just looks like a "bigger" woman. A lot of women have "masculized" features too, like sharp jaw line, bigger bone structure, etc and could be mistaken by trannies according to your view of what a woman looks like. He looks very passing to me. And the pics of Emma Ellingsen are not photoshopped. Heres a video of him with no makeup on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u444OxbhMss It's obvious that if they start taking hormones at like 13yo they are gonna end up looking very much like women

>>2552 Male and female bone structures are different. A large female bone structure is not equal to Petras' or any other males. The best a TiM can hope for is to either look like a skinny, androgynous 11-13 year old boy (which means he can pass as a girl or woman if he grows out his hair and wears makeup, especially the current trendy, super-heavy IG makeup which was literally designed for drag queens), and coincidentally, that's what the one in your video looks like without makeup and angles on his side. It still won't take away the completely rectangular male body shape unless he goes for heavy surgery on his body, and even then, he'll look "off", like Blaire White. Also, claiming the photos in >>2545 aren't photoshopped is just completely dishonest.

>>2553 Idk, a lot of them do look like pre teen boys but honestly I didn't know they were scrotes before I read someone mentioning it

>>2551 >Lol. They are all fetishist scrotes anon with 99% of TIMs that is true, but Kim was 6 when he was put on puberty blockers and hormones and had a sex change when he was 16, Jaz Jennings was 5 when he placed on hormones they were literal children who probably didn't know their ABC's and yet they were put on hormones bu their narc parents I feel sorry for them

>>2556 They don't regret it do they? Kim even thanks her parents for it and goes around influencing other people to do the same

>>2557 They've been told their entire lives that it was good for them and that it saved them, they were children anon when it happened to them and lived in a environment where everyone assured them that their "transition" was a good thing I mean they will likely kill themselves one day and everyone will say it was cause of transphobia,