My uni advisor is a dude and his lab is 99% females doing his work + one lad assistant who presents his projects. He recently coauthored a paper that asserts that a fucking test on "adapting to solving spartial problems", presented to the subjects as a vydia btw, shows evolutionaly differences between sexes where women are these dumb, unteachable cave-dwelling sitcom wives and men are brilliant adaptable hunters and shit.
In the results, though, basically dudes solved the problem slowly, but sped up on subsequent trials, and the women solved the first cases almost twice as quickly and so further adaptation was relatively slower. Women's end result was a bit slower, but that I would attribute to dudes always being in some fucking competition mode and jacking off vidya performance to perfection. Overall, results are inconclusive and evo-psych shit is baseless babble. In discussion, they formulated the evo-psych shit in "the whole lab agreed" terms only. And we aren't even close to social science, we're doing neural networks.
I mean, at least we have no trannies and the fiels is promising, but if he doesn't bring in a fat research grant in the next 2 years I'm fucking leaving.
Also, now I have to come up with independent research topic to remove myself from that and the doubtable projects he tries to get me involved into, and I have a week to find a good one.
Wanted to get into this dude's lab since highschool, fuck my life.