What goddamn "academic lady" are you talking about? Most GC/Radfem journalists and all out activists these days are all about that heterosexual life.
Is this a lifestyle choice issue or a class issue after all? Cause middle and upper class mothers are mothers still, and lower class not-het-partnered, child-free women are still women. The former never and would never do shit for the latter either.
Why are these women's sons even an issue in feminist spaces to begin with? Is this about daycare?
If that is just about niceties, what other categories of males should we STFU about? Some women have nice dads they hold dear, you know. Before you pull the "little boys are innocent always" shit - do you think little boys never harass, assault sexually abuse girls? Really?
And are we supposed to pretend a married woman's level of economic comfort is lesser than a single woman's? Not her personal income, that does decrease in het marriage, but that there is no monetary upside to marriage at all?
That begs the question, why the fuck even marry? Because I'm absolutely certain most of them do not even want to present their daughters with an alternative lifestyle to het marriage and having kids, and you would not criticize that situation.
Why the fuck is this always about moms, boys and boymoms, and never about girls these days. Because why the fuck would we focus on girls, they will likely grow up descent anyway.